Changed multi-line C comments into another style.
The left side doesn't look unbalanced.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -85,8 +85,8 @@ static unsigned HaveIRQRequest;
|
||||
#define GET_SF() ((Regs.SR & SF) != 0)
|
||||
|
||||
/* Set the flags. The parameter is a boolean flag that says if the flag should be
|
||||
* set or reset.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
** set or reset.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
#define SET_CF(f) do { if (f) { Regs.SR |= CF; } else { Regs.SR &= ~CF; } } while (0)
|
||||
#define SET_ZF(f) do { if (f) { Regs.SR |= ZF; } else { Regs.SR &= ~ZF; } } while (0)
|
||||
#define SET_IF(f) do { if (f) { Regs.SR |= IF; } else { Regs.SR &= ~IF; } } while (0)
|
||||
@@ -96,8 +96,8 @@ static unsigned HaveIRQRequest;
|
||||
#define SET_SF(f) do { if (f) { Regs.SR |= SF; } else { Regs.SR &= ~SF; } } while (0)
|
||||
|
||||
/* Special test and set macros. The meaning of the parameter depends on the
|
||||
* actual flag that should be set or reset.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
** actual flag that should be set or reset.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
#define TEST_ZF(v) SET_ZF (((v) & 0xFF) == 0)
|
||||
#define TEST_SF(v) SET_SF (((v) & 0x80) != 0)
|
||||
#define TEST_CF(v) SET_CF (((v) & 0xFF00) != 0)
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user