Renamed INITBSS to INIT and INIT to ONCE.

The way we want to use the INITBSS segment - and especially the fact that it won't have the type bss on all ROM based targets - means that the name INITBSS is misleading. After all INIT is the best name from my perspective as it serves several purposes and therefore needs a rather generic name.

Unfortunately this means that the current INIT segment needs to be renamed too. Looking for a short (ideally 4 letter) name I came up with ONCE as it contains all code (and data) accessed only once during initialization.
This commit is contained in:
Oliver Schmidt
2016-03-06 21:26:22 +01:00
parent ab1600b346
commit 419eb700b5
132 changed files with 402 additions and 390 deletions

View File

@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ SYMBOLS {
__STACKSIZE__: type = weak, value = $0800; # 2k stack
__OVERLAYSIZE__: type = weak, value = $1000; # 4k overlay
__LOADADDR__: type = weak, value = __STARTUP_RUN__;
__LOADSIZE__: type = weak, value = __INITBSS_RUN__ - __STARTUP_RUN__ +
__LOADSIZE__: type = weak, value = __INIT_RUN__ - __STARTUP_RUN__ +
__MOVE_LAST__ - __MOVE_START__;
}
MEMORY {
@@ -45,9 +45,9 @@ SEGMENTS {
CODE: load = RAM, type = ro;
RODATA: load = RAM, type = ro;
DATA: load = RAM, type = rw;
INITBSS: load = RAM, type = bss, define = yes;
INIT: load = RAM, type = bss, define = yes;
BSS: load = RAM, type = bss, define = yes;
INIT: load = MOVE, run = RAM, type = ro, define = yes, optional = yes;
ONCE: load = MOVE, run = RAM, type = ro, define = yes, optional = yes;
LC: load = MOVE, run = LC, type = ro, optional = yes;
OVERLAY1: load = OVL1, type = ro, define = yes, optional = yes;
OVERLAY2: load = OVL2, type = ro, define = yes, optional = yes;
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ FEATURES {
CONDES: type = constructor,
label = __CONSTRUCTOR_TABLE__,
count = __CONSTRUCTOR_COUNT__,
segment = INIT;
segment = ONCE;
CONDES: type = destructor,
label = __DESTRUCTOR_TABLE__,
count = __DESTRUCTOR_COUNT__,