the10thwiz/cc65
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Renamed INITBSS to INIT and INIT to ONCE.

Browse Source 
The way we want to use the INITBSS segment - and especially the fact that it won't have the type bss on all ROM based targets - means that the name INITBSS is misleading. After all INIT is the best name from my perspective as it serves several purposes and therefore needs a rather generic name.

Unfortunately this means that the current INIT segment needs to be renamed too. Looking for a short (ideally 4 letter) name I came up with ONCE as it contains all code (and data) accessed only once during initialization.
This commit is contained in:
Oliver Schmidt
2016-03-06 21:26:22 +01:00
parent ab1600b346
commit 419eb700b5
132 changed files with 402 additions and 390 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
cfg/lunix.cfg
View File

@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ SEGMENTS {
ZEROPAGE: load = ZP, type = zp, define = yes; # Pseudo-registers
STARTUP: load = RAM, type = ro; # First initialization code
LOWCODE: load = RAM, type = ro, optional = yes; # Legacy from other platforms
INIT: load = RAM, type = ro, define = yes, optional = yes; # Library initialization code
ONCE: load = RAM, type = ro, define = yes, optional = yes; # Library initialization code
CODE: load = RAM, type = ro; # Program
RODATA: load = RAM, type = ro; # Literals, constants
DATA: load = RAM, type = rw; # Initialized variables
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ FEATURES {
CONDES: type = constructor,
label = __CONSTRUCTOR_TABLE__,
count = __CONSTRUCTOR_COUNT__,
segment = INIT;
segment = ONCE;
CONDES: type = destructor,
label = __DESTRUCTOR_TABLE__,
count = __DESTRUCTOR_COUNT__,